SF Chronicle urban critic John King, who is "not a fan of sprawl," nevertheless wrote yesterday that sprawl is environmentally wasteful, but then so is our culture, so don't blame sprawl for the wastefulness. I disagree. Controlling sprawl is like anger management; people can continue to be angry, but by controlling their behavior, many problems can be avoided. Sprawl is behavior. We can control behavior, but not the temperment of people. Managing sprawl is managing very harmful and hurtful behavior. It's up to us, culturally, to deal with it. Not to simply throw up our hands and maintain that any transgressions we commit because of our culture are okay, because to do anything else wouldn't be true to ourselves. The real truth hurts, sprawl hurts, and the media should either not take on the role of apologists, or avoid the topic entirely. True journalism comforts the afflicted and afflicts the comfortable. It doesn't comfort the comfortable.
About Me

- Name: Scott Mace
Tech writer, editor, podcaster spanning the eons of tech journalism from InfoWorld to Byte to Boardwatch to Windows Secrets to HealthLeaders Media.
-
Blogroll
Previous Posts
- Michael S. Malone, writing about the failures of d...
- The Toronto Star reports that Canadian urban plann...
- Video of the year has to be R.E.M.'s new "Bad Day"...
- Half-page ad on page 3 of the Oakland Tribune this...
- I've added a service from Bloglet that allows you ...
- New York Times: Scooters, Long a Nuisance, Draw An...
- Bruce De Benedictis: "I once pointed out that the ...
- Then there's this report from a Knight-Ridder news...
- The latest impact of California sprawl: a shortage...
- Oakland Tribune: "Tailpipe emissions have dropped ...


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home